Picture this: The stock market is buzzing like a beehive on steroids, with AI companies valued at eye-watering trillions.
Investors are piling in, convinced this tech revolution will redefine everything from your morning coffee order to global economies.
But hold on…what if we’re not in the golden age of innovation, but smack in the middle of a bubble that’s eerily reminiscent of the late 1990s dot-com frenzy?
Back then, the internet promised to change the world, and it did…just not before wiping out billions in overinflated valuations.
Today, AI is the star of the show, but whispers of doubt are growing louder.
Are we in 1998, with room to run, or 1999, teetering on the edge? Or worse, 2000, when the party crashed hard?
The debate rages on. Optimists see AI as the ultimate game-changer, poised to slash costs and boost productivity across industries. Pessimists? They argue the stocks are wildly overhyped, detached from real-world economics.
Interestingly, both sides agree AI is the future…it’s just a question of timing and pricing.
Retail investors, many without scars from the dot-com bust, are leading the charge, buying into the narrative that this time is different. They scoff at comparisons to flops like Pets.com, insisting AI has solid fundamentals.
But dig into history, and you’ll find the bull case for Pets.com in 1998 was just as compelling: exploding online pet sales, massive market potential, backed by Wall Street analyses that sounded airtight.
Sound familiar?
Today’s AI valuations hinge on similar promises of trillion-dollar profits down the line. Yet, beneath the hype, the math might not add up as neatly as bulls hope.
What happens when competition turns AI into a commodity, and prices plummet to rock bottom?
Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Rebel Capitalist News Desk to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
